ABSTRACT
The sudden onset of the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic required agile development of standards and efficient validation of assays to assess prevalence of infection as well as immune responses to infection and vaccination. Leveraging their experience in HPV serology and standards, the Vaccine, Immunity and Cancer Directorate (VICD) at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNCLR) pivoted to address this unmet need in SARS-Co-V2 serology clinical testing and research. This standardization effort required the collection and processing of large volumes of blood from SARS-Co-V2 infected and uninfected individuals into serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Collaborations with specimen collection sites across the United States were established. Following qualification for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM levels in independent laboratories, VICD assembled reference evaluation panels, which were used to assist the FDA's performance evaluation of commercial assays submitted for EUA approval. To date, 185 different shipments of the standard or validation panel have been sent to both domestic and international labs. These materials are also available to the SARS-CoV-2 serology community for assay calibration and performance evaluation which greatly facilitates assay data harmonization. In addition, the NCI Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) was born from this initiative and expertise, resulting in the establishment of Capacity Building Centers (CBCs) for sample collection from different healthy, cancer and immunocompromised cohorts at Mount Sinai, Arizona State University, the University of Minnesota, and Northwell Feinstein. The NCI and FNLCR simultaneously collaborated to develop a network of investigators focused on advancing research on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination among diverse and vulnerable populations, including cancer patients. Their research has resulted in over 326 peer-reviewed publications. The CBC's have enrolled patients in longitudinal studies, resulting in a centralized collection of annotated, well characterized serum, PBMCs and clinical data. Numerous cancer cohorts, but predominantly Multiple Myeloma, are included. Furthermore, technology development was supported at the CBC's. Based upon this success, the VICD in collaboration with NCI is pursuing an even more innovative effort in pandemic preparedness to establish a Center for Serology and Data Emergency Preparedness (CESDEP);a global network able to activate and pivot to address pandemic-level threats, while continuing to expand the development of immunological assays that can inform clinical decisions for cancer and other immunocompromised patients.
ABSTRACT
Telemedicine is a modality which utilizes technology to provide and support health care across large distances. It has redefined the practices of medicine in many specialties and continues to be a boon for clinicians on many frontiers. Its role in the branch of anesthesia remains largely unexplored but has shown to be beneficial in all the three phases: pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative. Now time has come that anesthesiologists across the globe reassess their strategies and utilize the telemedicine facilities in the field of anesthesia.Copyright © 2021 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: Despite the successful implementation of vaccines worldwide, COVID-19 remains a risk in patients with a compromised immune system. Emerging viral variants have also reduced the effectiveness of monoclonal antibody therapies in these patients. New treatment options are therefore required to improve clinical outcomes. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): T cell immunotherapy has proven effective for the treatment of a number of refractory viral diseases in patients with a compromised immune system. We have now completed the manufacture of a bank of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells and commenced an open-label phase I clinical trial at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia. Patients enrolled in the study receive two doses of partially HLA-matched allogeneic T cells at a fortnightly interval. We have thus far recruited and treated three immune compromised patients with SARS-CoV-2 T cells. In two of the three patients treated thus far, the administration of T cell therapy was coincident with the clearance of viral load after 28 days. Viral clearance in these patients was also associated with an increase in circulating SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells. Our preliminary observations suggest that SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell therapy is well tolerated and has the potential to impact viral control in immune compromised patients.Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: Immunocompromised patients are susceptible to high-risk opportunistic infections and malignant diseases. If available, most antiviral and antifungal drugs are quite toxic, relatively ineffective, and induce resistance in the long term. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): We have previously demonstrated the safety of adoptive cell therapy for COVID-19 patients with CD45RA negative cells containing SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells from a donor, chosen based on HLA compatibility and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools. After finishing a Phase 2 randomized multicenter clinical trial (RELEASE, NCT04578210), we concluded that the infusion is safe, effective, accelerates lymphocyte recovery and shows hallmarks of an immune response. To use adoptive cell therapy to treat COVID-19 it would be necessary to develop a biobank of living drugs. For that, we examined the immune evolution performing a longitudinal analysis from previously SARS-CoV-2 infected and infection- naive individuals covering 21 months from infection. Cellular responses were maintained over time while humoral responses increased after vaccination but were gradually lost. Therefore, the best donors would be recovered individuals and two months after vaccination. We also evaluated the effect of dexamethasone (current standard of care treatment for COVID-19 and other infections involving lymphopenia) and Interleukin-15 (cytokine involved in T-cell maintenance and survival) on CD45RA negative. Dexamethasone did not alter cell functionality, proliferation or phenotype at a clinical-practice concentration, while interleukin-15 increased the memory T-cell and T-regulatory cell activation state, and interferon gamma release. Furthermore, we applied the adoptive passive transfer of CD45RA negative cells containing pathogen-specific memory T-cells to other infectious diseases characterized by sustained lymphopenia. We infused six immunocompromised patients with Cytomegalovirus, BK virus, Aspergillus, and Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease. Patients experienced pathogen clearance, resolution of symptoms and lymphocyte increase. Transient microchimerism was detected in three patients. The use of CD45RA negative cells containing specific memory T cells of a third-party donor for treating severe pathogenic diseases in immunocompromised patients is feasible, safe, and effective, and has an advantage over other cell therapies such as lower costs and a less complex regulatory environment.Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Breakthrough infection (BI) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has exploded owing to the emergence of various SARS-CoV-2 variants and has become a major problem at present. In this study, we analyzed the epidemiological information and possession status of neutralizing antibodies in patients with BI using SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped viruses (SARS-CoV-2pv). Analysis of 44 specimens diagnosed with COVID-19 after two or more vaccinations showed high inhibition of infection by 90% or more against the Wuhan strain and the Alpha and Delta variants of pseudotyped viruses in 40 specimens. In contrast, almost no neutralizing activity was observed against the Omicron BA.1 variant. Many cases without neutralizing activity or BI were immunosuppressed individuals. The results of this study show that contact with an infected person can result in BI even when there are sufficient neutralizing antibodies in the blood. Thus, even after vaccination, sufficient precautions must be taken to prevent infection.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 dynamics across different COVID-19 waves has been unclear in immunocompromised children. We aimed to compare the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral load (VL) during the first and third waves of COVID-19 in immunocompromised children. A retrospective and longitudinal cohort study was conducted in a pediatric referral hospital of Argentina. The study included 28 admitted immunocompromised children with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thirteen acquired the infection during COVID-19 first wave (May to August 2020, group 1 (G1)) and fifteen in the third wave (January to March 2022, group 2 (G2)). RNA viral load measure and its dynamic reconstruction were performed in nasopharyngeal swabs by validated quantitative, real time RT-PCR, and linear mixed-effects model, respectively. Of the 28 children included, 54% were girls, most of them had hemato-oncological pathology (57%), and the median age was 8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3-13). The dynamic of VL was similar in both groups (P = 0.148), starting from a level of 5.34 log10 copies/mL (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.47-6.21) in G1 and 5.79 log10 copies/mL (95% CI: 4.93-6.65) in G2. Then, VL decayed with a rate of 0.059 (95% CI: 0.038-0.080) and 0.088 (95% CI: 0.058-0.118) log10 copies/mL per day since diagnosis and fell below the limit of quantification at days 51 and 39 after diagnosis in G1 and G2, respectively. Our results evidenced a longer viral RNA persistence in immunocompromised pediatric patients and no difference in VL dynamic between COVID-19 first wave-attributed to ancestral infections-and third wave-attributed to Omicron infections.
ABSTRACT
The World Health Organization has issued a report on 228 cases of acute hepatitis of unknown cause in children between 1 month and 16 years, 10% of them required liver transplantation and 4 died (3 in Indonesia), another 50 cases are under investigation. The adenovirus type 41 is one of the causative agents of acute gastroenteritis in children, characterized by diarrhea, vomiting and fever, often accompanied by respiratory symptoms. Cases of hepatitis in immunocompromised children have been documented;however, there is no available evidence to indicate that adenovirus type 41 can cause hepatitis in healthy children. Although adenovirus is currently hypothesized as the underlying cause, it does not fully explain the severity of the clinical picture. Given this new situation, we have more questions than answers, the reported cases had no apparent risk factors, most had not received the COVID-19 vaccine. Several hypotheses are being evaluated and it seems that the infectious cause is more solid. The possible role of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in children reported with acute hepatitis is analyzed.Copyright © 2022 Comunicaciones Cientificas Mexicanas S.A. de C.V.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Gastrointestinal tract involvement from herpes simplex virus is commonly associated with esophagitis. However, herpes simplex infection of the stomach is very rare with only a handful of cases being reported in immunocompromised patients. We present a case of herpes gastritis causing gastric outlet obstruction in an otherwise healthy, immunocompetent individual. Case Description/Methods: A 37-year-old male with a recent past medical history of COVID-19 infection, presented to the hospital with intractable nausea, vomiting, bloating, and early satiety for two days. Upon evaluation, CBC and CMP were remarkable for a WBC of 12.5 k/mm3 and ALT and AST of 124 U/L and 129 U/L, respectively. Lipase was 373 U/L. A CT abdomen/pelvis w/contrast showed circumferential wall thickening with edematous changes in the antrum consistent with localized inflammatory response. There was suspicion for gastric lymphoma and patient was admitted for further workup. An EGD was performed which showed exudative esophagitis and antral wall edema with luminal narrowing of gastric antrum. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed a 2.5 x 3 cm antral wall lesion worrisome for linitis plastica. Esophageal biopsies showed focal cytologic changes consistent with herpes esophagitis. The FNA of the gastric antral wall showed multinucleation of the basal cell layer with classic ground glass nuclei, consistent with herpes infection. No dysplasia or malignancy was seen. Both HSV1 and HSV2 IgG were elevated. HSV IgM was normal. A HSV PCR was ordered but never resulted. Patient was started on Valacyclovir 1 g PO BID for 10 days. He underwent a follow-up EGD 3 months later which showed complete resolution of the gastric antral changes (Figure). Discussion(s): Herpes gastritis is extremely rare. Literature review has revealed only 3 case reports of herpes gastritis;and all involved immunocompromised patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of herpes gastritis in an immunocompetent patient. Our patient presented with symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction which was caused by local inflammation from herpes simplex. It is unclear if having a COVID 19 infection altered patient's immunity and lead to herpes gastritis. This may need further investigation. No established guideline exists for treatment duration. Our patient received 10-day course of Valacyclovir, and his symptoms improved. Furthermore, patient had complete resolution of the herpes infection on follow-up EGD, indicating adequate treatment response.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Disseminated histoplasmosis (DH) presents as primarily lung manifestations with extrapulmonary involvement in immunocompromised hosts. Granulomatous hepatitis as first presentation of DH in an immunocompetent host is uncommon. Case Description/Methods: 25-year-old female presented with one month of fever, fatigue, myalgias, 30-pound weight loss, cough, nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain. She has lived in the Midwest and southwestern US. Presenting labs: TB 1.9 mg/dL, AP 161 U/L, AST 172 U/L, ALT 463 U/L. Workup was negative for COVID, viral/autoimmune hepatitis, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and HIV. CT scan showed suspected gallstones and 9 mm left lower lobe noncalcified nodule. EUS showed a normal common bile duct, gallbladder sludge and enlarged porta hepatis lymph nodes which underwent fine needle aspiration (FNA). She was diagnosed with biliary colic and underwent cholecystectomy, with white plaques noted on the liver surface (A). Liver biopsy/FNA showed necrotizing granulomas (B) and fungal yeast on GMS stain (C). Although histoplasmosis urine and blood antigens were negative, histoplasmosis complement fixation was >1:256. She could not tolerate itraconazole for DH, requiring amphotericin B. She then transitioned to voriconazole, discontinued after 5 weeks due to increasing AP. However, her symptoms resolved with normal transaminases. At one year follow up, she is asymptomatic with normal liver function tests. Discussion(s): DH is a systemic granulomatous disease caused by Histoplasma capsulatum endemic to Ohio, Mississippi River Valley, and southeastern US. DH more commonly affects immunocompromised hosts with AIDS, immunosuppressants, and organ transplant. Gastrointestinal involvement is common in DH (70-90%) with liver involvement in 90%. However, granulomatous hepatitis as primary manifestation of DH is rare (4% of liver biopsies). Hepatic granulomas are seen in < 20%. Patients may present with nonspecific systemic symptoms. Serum/urine antigens may be negative. Gold standard for diagnosis is identifying yeast on tissue stains. Recommended treatment is amphotericin B followed by 1 year of itraconazole. However, shorter treatment duration may be effective in immunocompetent hosts. This case is unique in that granulomatous hepatitis was the first presentation of DH in our immunocompetent patient diagnosed on EUS FNA and liver biopsy. Clinicians must have a high degree of suspicion for DH in patients with fever of unknown origin especially in endemic areas regardless of immunologic status. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Immunocompromised patients have a reduced ability to generate antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination, and are at a high risk of SARSPOSTERS CoV-2 infection, complications and mortality. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of two monoclonal antibodies which bind to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, preventing the virus entering human cells. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab has been approved as COVID-19 prophylaxis for immunocompromised individuals, and is being used in over 32 different countries. The phase III PROVENT clinical trial found that high-risk participants prophylactically administered Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab had a significantly reduced risk of COVID- 19 infection after three and six months compared to controls. However, the PROVENT trial was conducted prior to the SARS-CoV- 2 Omicron wave, and did not include participants who had been previously vaccinated or infected. This systematic review provides an updated summary of the real-world clinical evidence of the efficacy of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab for immunocompromised patients. The review reports breakthrough COVID-19 infections as its primary outcome. COVID-19-related hospitalisations, ITU admissions and mortality were included as secondary outcomes. Methods Two independent reviewers conducted electronic searches of PubMed and Medxriv, on 03/08/22 and 01/10/22. Clinical studies which reported the primary outcome of breakthrough COVID-19 infections after Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab administration were included. Clinical effectiveness was determined using the case-control clinical effectiveness methodology. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between intervention and control groups were also calculated. The GRADE tool was used to assess the level of certainty for the primary outcome. Results 17 clinical studies were included in the review, with a total of 24,773 immunocompromised participants from across the world, of whom 10,775 received Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab. One randomised controlled trial, ten retrospective cohort studies (two of which were preprints) and six prospective cohort studies (one preprint) were included. The majority of studies reported clinical outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave. Six studies compared a Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab intervention group to a control group. Reasons for participant immunocompromise included rheumatology patients treated with immunosuppressant drugs, transplant recipients and those with malignancies. Overall, the clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab against COVID- 19 breakthrough infection was 40.47% (CI 29.82-49.67;p<0.0001), COVID-19 hospitalisation- 69.23% (CI: 50.78-81.64;p<0.00001), ITU admission- 87.89% (CI: 47.12-98.66;p=0.0008), all-cause mortality- 81.29% (66.93-90.28;p<0.0001 and COVID-19-specifc mortality- 86.36% (CI:-6.21-99.70;p=0.0351). Conclusion There is a growing body of real-world evidence validating the original PROVENT phase III study regarding the clinical effectiveness of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as prophylaxis for immunocompromised groups, notably demonstrating effectiveness during the Omicron wave. This systematic review demonstrates the significant clinical effectiveness of prophylactic Tixagevimb/Cilgavimab at reducing COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, ITU admission and mortality for immunosuppressed individuals. It is critically important that largerscale and better-controlled studies are performed to highlight the significant clinical benefit of prophylactic antibody treatment in immunocompromised groups.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been striking for three years and, despite the regular arise of new variants, populations are now widely immune and protected from severe symptoms. However, immunocompromised patients still have worse clinical outcomes, higher mortality and rarely develop effective immunity through vaccination or infection. Here, we studied the temporal distribution of infections, viral loads (VL) as well as the viral genetic diversity among an immunocompromised patient cohort, between January 2021 and September 2022. Method(s): Overall, 478 immunocompromised patients (solid organ transplant, HIV positive, cancer, autoimmune disease) and 234 controls (healthcare workers) from Pitie-Salpetriere and Bichat Claude-Bernard University hospitals (Paris, FRANCE) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-qPCR. Whole genome sequencing was performed according to ARTIC protocol on Oxford Nanopore platform. All 712 full viral genomes were used to determine lineages and mapped to Wuhan-Hu-1 reference to produce a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (IQTree, 1000 bootstraps). Differences in temporal distributions of infections and VL were assessed using nonparametric statistical tests. Result(s): According to phylogenetic analysis, genomes from SARS-CoV- 2 infecting immunocompromised patients and those infecting healthy individuals are distributed in a similar way. No significant genetic differences can be observed between viral genomes from patients and controls within the different lineages. Temporal distribution of COVID-19 infections were also similar between immunocompromised patients and controls, with the exception of BA.2 variant for which controls were infected earlier (p< 0.001). VL were significantly lower in immunocompromised patients infected with Omicron variants (p=0.04). No differences in VL were observed for Alpha and Delta variants. Conclusion(s): At diagnosis, no intrinsic genetic divergence was observed in virus infecting immunocompromised patients compared to those circulating in the general population. Similarities in temporal distribution of infections between controls and patients suggest that these different groups become infected concomitantly. VL appeared to be lower for Omicron variants in immunocompromised patients. An earlier VL peak of Omicron and a testing of immunocompromised patients hospitalized once severe symptoms have appeared could indicate a delayed testing in these patients, once the replicative phase over. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In this study, we share the results of immunosuppressed patients who suffered from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia managed in our ICU. Method(s): We tracked all patients admitted to ICU of a Tertiary Hospital diagnosed with severe SARS-COV2 pneumonia from March 1, 2020 to January 31, 2022. The definition of Immunocompromised patient is based on history of transplantation, active neoplasia, autoimmune diseases or HIV. Collected data includes: sex, age, type of immunosuppression, vaccination, mechanical ventilation, ECMO VV, incidence of superinfections and mortality. Result(s): From a cohort of 425 patients, 55 met the inclusion criteria. 33% were women and 67% male. The average age was 58 years for women and 62 years for men. Out of these patients, 27% had solid organ transplants. 40% suffered from neoplasic disease. 27% had autoimmune diseases and were under treatment with immunosuppressants. 3 had HIV. Only the 29% had received at least 1 dose of COVID 19 vaccine. 80% required orotracheal intubation. 3.64% (2) required Veno-Venous ECMO. 61% presented bacterial superinfection, with the most frequent germs being Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus. 36% had viral superinfection, being cytomegalovirus the most frequent one. 32% had fungal superinfection, mainly by Aspergillus fumigatus. 27% did not suffer any superinfection. 40% of the total sample died. After logistic regression, in our model (AUC 83,4% (Se 57.1%, Sp 87.9%), we identified need of intubation as independent variable of mortality (OR 27,06 IC95% 1.76-415.55, p = 0.018). Conclusion(s): Immunocompromised patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia present high mortality, with statistically significant difference when mechanical ventilation is needed. The most frequently isolated germs causing superinfection in this group of patients are bacterias. We believe that this group of patients require special care in our ICU units and an in-depth analysis and study to optimize their prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: The risk factors for the development of severe COVID-19 illness have been well researched and documented since the beginning of the pandemic. Subsequently, mass vaccination rollouts have occurred with over 90% of the population being fully vaccinated. The aim of this single centre study was to describe the risk factors associated with the development of severe COVID-19 disease in the vaccinated population. Method(s): A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to the Gold Coast University Hospital during a week (8 th to 14 th inclusive) in January 2022 was conducted. All patients were included regardless of primary indication for admission. Data was obtained using the electronic medical records and included patient demographics, comorbidities, vaccination status (with fully vaccinated defined as two or more doses of any COVID-19 vaccination), COVID-19 severity (as defined by the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce), complications of disease (such as secondary infection, pulmonary embolism, non-invasive and invasive ventilation, length of stay, ICU admission, mortality, representation/readmission). Univariate analysis was then performed. Result(s): 162 patients were admitted to the Gold Coast University Hospital during the study period and included in the analysis. 103 (63%) patients were fully vaccinated. 52 (32%) patients developed severe COVID-19 disease. In the fully vaccinated group, 34 (33%) patients developed severe COVID-19, compared with 18 (32%) in unvaccinated group). Chronic cardiovascular disease (p=<0.001), respiratory disease (p = 0.025), renal failure (p = 0.044), diabetes (p = 0.003) and current immunocompromise (p = 0.025) were associated with the development of severe COVID-19. Obesity was not a significant risk factor. Conclusion(s): Risk factors for progression to severe COVID 19 previously identified in unvaccinated patients early in the pandemic (with the exception of obesity) remain significantly associated with risk of severe disease in the vaccinated population.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: Medium and long-term impacts of COVID-19 pneumonitis are being increasingly recognised. Our study aimed to evaluate outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory compromise. Method(s): Patients admitted to a tertiary centre with COVID-19 pneumonitis (March 2020-October 2022) were followed in the Post-COVID Respiratory Clinic at 6-24 weeks. Baseline demographics, admission details, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and clinic data were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to investigate for predictors of persisting respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, cough, chest pain) and functional limitation (self-reported). Result(s): 125 patients (64.8%male, 63.2+/-16.7years, 42.5% former/current smokers, BMI 31.0+/-8.0kg/m2, 49.6% fully vaccinated) with median follow-up time of 85 [interquartile range (IQR) 64-131] days were included. Pre-existing conditions included lung disease (29.6%), immunocompromise (15.2%), diabetes (24.8%) and hypertension (43.6%). 35.2% required ICU care (14.4% mechanical ventilated, 4% ECMO), 44.8% received high flow nasal prong oxygen and/or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). At initial clinic follow up, 65.4% had persisting X-ray changes. Mean predicted FEV1, FVC, DLCO were 86.8+/-20.7%, 85.3+/-20.3%, 82.2+/-19.8% respectively. Symptoms included dyspnoea (63.2%), fatigue (24.2%), cognitive dysfunction (12.9%) and musculoskeletal complaints (10.5%). Univariate predictors of continued respiratory and/or functional disability included age [odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95%confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06, p = 0.01), prior lung disease (OR2.98, 95%CI 1.05-8.48, p = 0.04), hypertension OR2.61, 95%CI 1.09-6.22, p = 0.03) and length of hospital stay (LOHS) (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.07, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, only LOHS was independently predictive of continued respiratory and functional limitations (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.07, p = 0.02). Conclusion(s): Patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonitis have a large burden of disability at follow-up. Older age, hypertension, lung disease and LOHS are risk factors for delayed recovery.
ABSTRACT
Background: There is limited information on effectiveness of COVID-19 therapies in immunocompromised patients, who are at higher risk of hospitalizations, complications, and mortality due to COVID-19. We examined hospital all-cause mortality for early RDV use vs. no RDV use among immunocompromised COVID-19 patients across several distinct dominant variants of concern (VOC) periods: pre-Delta (Dec'20-Apr'21), Delta (May-Nov'21) and Omicron (Dec'21-Apr'22). Method(s): Using the Premier Healthcare Database, we identified adults with an immunocompromised condition (cancer, solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant, hematologic malignancies, primary immunodeficiencies, asplenia, bone marrow failure/aplastic anemia, severe combined immunodeficiencies or HIV), hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients treated with RDV in first 2 days of admission vs. those not treated with RDV during the hospitalization were matched using 1:1 preferential withinhospital propensity matching with replacement. Patients were excluded if discharged within 3 days of RDV initiation. Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used to examine time to 14-and 28-day mortality. Result(s): Overall (Dec'20-Apr'22), 14,169 RDV-treated patients were matched to 5,341 unique non-RDV patients. Post-matching balance was achieved with 59% being 65+ years, 40.5% with no supplementary oxygen charges, 39% received low-flow oxygen, 19% on high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation and 1.5% on invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO at baseline. During the study period, unadjusted mortality rate was significantly lower for RDV patients at 14 days (11% [95% CI: 11%-12%] vs 15% [15%-16%];p< .0001) and 28 days (18% [17%-18%];p< .0001 vs 22% [22%-23%];p< .0001) as compared to patients that did not receive RDV. After adjusting for baseline and clinical covariates, 14-day results showed that RDV had significantly lower mortality risk compared to non-RDV across all VOC periods [overall (30% lower risk), pre-delta (41%), Delta (23%), Omicron (25%)]. Similarly, 28-day results showed that RDV had significantly lower mortality risk compared to non-RDV across all VOC periods [overall (25%), pre-delta (35%), Delta (21%), Omicron (16%)] (Fig). Conclusion(s): Timely initiation of RDV in first two days of hospital admission demonstrated significant mortality reduction in immunocompromised patients hospitalized with primary diagnosis of COVID-19. RDV demonstrated consistent benefit in an immunocompromised cohort across all variant periods of the pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background: Immunocompromised persons are disproportionately affected by severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, but immune compromise is heterogenous, which may impact viral dynamics. We hypothesized that higher degrees of compromised immunity are associated with higher viral shedding and slower viral clearance in the absence of COVID-19 therapeutics. Method(s): Participants enrolled in ACTIV-2/A5401, a platform trial for COVID-19 therapeutics in non-hospitalized adults within 10 days of symptom onset, received either an active treatment or placebo between 8/2020 and 7/2021. Participants were categorized based on the extent of immunosuppression into none, mild, moderate and severe categories at enrollment (day 0). Longitudinal anterior nasal (AN) and plasma SARS-CoV-2 levels were measured with a quantitative PCR assay. Regression models assessed associations between immunocompromise severity and viral levels (VL) at day 0, and longitudinally among those on placebo with quantifiable RNA at day 0. Multivariate analyses adjusted for demographics and symptom duration and vaccination status at day 0. Result(s): Immunocompromised (mild 383, moderate 159, severe 35) and immunocompetent (1956) participants had comparable symptom durations at day 0 (median 6 days) and most were unvaccinated (~95%). AN VL at day 0 was higher in the moderate/severe group compared to the immunocompetent group (adjusted difference in means: 0.47 log10 copies/mL, 95% CI 0.12, 0.83). While AN VL decayed at similar rates among all groups from day 0 to 3, there was a trend towards higher cumulative AN VLs across the 28-day follow-up in the moderate/severe group compared to immunocompetent group (adjusted fold difference in VL AUC 1.63, 95%CI 0.95, 2.77). The mild group showed no differences in day 0 VL or AUC compared to the immunocompetent group. The frequency of detectable plasma SARS-CoV-2 RNA was similar at day 0 across all groups (overall 21%), but there appeared to be a higher proportion of immunocompromised participants with detectable plasma viral RNA at day 7 (moderate/severe 2/23 [9%], mild 5/44 [11%]) compared to the immunocompetent group (8/282, 3%). Conclusion(s): Before emergence of Omicron and widespread vaccination, moderate/severe immunocompromised status was associated with higher nasal viral levels at study enrollment and showed a trend towards higher cumulative AN viral load, and all immunocompromised groups appeared to have more persistent plasma viremia during follow-up.